Outcomes after emergency general surgery and trauma care in incarcerated individuals: An EAST multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: The US incarcerates more individuals than any other country. Prisoners are the only population guaranteed health care by the US constitution, but little is known about their surgical needs. This multicenter study aimed to describe the acute care surgery (ACS) needs of incarcerated individuals. METHODS: Twelve centers prospectively identified incarcerated patients evaluated in their emergency department by the ACS service. Centers collected diagnosis, treatment, and complications from chart review. Patients were classified as either emergency general surgery (EGS) patients or trauma patients and their characteristics and outcomes were investigated. Poisson regression accounting for clustering by center was used to calculate the relative risk (RR) of readmission, representation within 90 days, and failure to follow-up as an outpatient within 90 days for each cohort. RESULTS: More than 12 months, ACS services evaluated 943 patients, 726 (80.3%) from jail, 156 (17.3%) from prison, and 22 (2.4%) from other facilities. Most were men (89.7%) with a median age of 35 years (interquartile range, 27-47). Trauma patients comprised 54.4% (n = 513) of the cohort. Admission rates were similar for trauma (61.5%) and EGS patients (60.2%). Head injuries and facial fractures were the most common injuries, while infections were the most common EGS diagnosis. Self-harm resulted in 102 trauma evaluations (19.9%). Self-inflicted injuries were associated with increased risk of readmission (RR, 4.3; 95% confidence interval, 3.02-6.13) and reevaluation within 90 days (RR, 4.96; 95% confidence interval, 3.07-8.01). CONCLUSION: Incarcerated patients who present with a range of trauma and EGS conditions frequently require admission, and follow-up after hospitalization was low at the treating center. Poor follow-up coupled with high rates of assault, self-harm, mental health, and substance use disorders highlight the vulnerability of this population. Hospital and correctional facility interventions are needed to decrease self-inflicted injuries and assaults while incarcerated. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and epidemiological, Level III.

Hypertension in the Young Adult Trauma Population: Rethinking the Traditional "Incidentaloma".

BACKGROUND: Hypertension (HTN) is a treatable and preventable risk factor for cardiovascular disease that is often overlooked in young adults. As a result, young patients with HTN may enter the health care system as a trauma without a preexisting diagnosis. The potential impact of HTN (diagnosed and undiagnosed) on trauma outcomes is not known. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients aged 18-39 y from the 2013-2017 North Carolina Trauma Registry were included. Patients were stratified as having no HTN, previously diagnosed HTN (PD-HTN), or newly diagnosed HTN (ND-HTN) during a trauma admission. Multivariable logistic and linear regression compared inpatient outcomes between patients with and without HTN, as well as ND-HTN and PD-HTN. RESULTS: Six percent of trauma patients were diagnosed with HTN (n = 1906; 14% ND-HTN). Those with HTN were more likely to have an inpatient complication (odds ratio [OR]: 1.65, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.32-2.07) and intensive care unit stay (OR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.12-1.46) compared with patients without HTN. Compared with PD-HTN, those with ND-HTN were more likely to present with extreme injury. In addition, patients with ND-HTN had higher odds of inpatient complications (OR: 1.95, 95% CI: 1.18-3.22) and 30-d readmission (OR: 2.00, 95% CI: 0.95-4.20) after accounting for demographics and injury severity. CONCLUSIONS: More than 10% of young adult trauma patients with HTN are not diagnosed before admission. HTN appears to have a detrimental impact on patient outcomes, with newly diagnosed patients having the worst outcomes. Trauma may serve as an opportunity for the diagnosis and treatment of HTN in young adults. Future studies should assess the impact of intervention on trauma outcomes.

Should Anesthesiologists and Surgeons Take Breaks During Cases?

Anesthesiologists regularly take breaks during operations, whereas surgeons do so more rarely. This article considers the origins of this difference in practice in relation to different characteristics of the work of these 2 specialties as well as differences in professional identity, both of which can contribute to varying break practices and perceptions of the value of breaks. The authors draw upon current literature about the influence of breaks on attention, focus, and stamina and then reflect on the influence of breaks on the relationships between anesthesiologists and surgeons.

Delivering Hospital-based Medical Care to Incarcerated Patients in North Carolina State Prisons: A Call for Communication and Collaboration.

Many incarcerated patients will require in-hospital care outside prison facilities. Often, this care is provided by clinicians unfamiliar with the correctional context. In this article, we reflect on our experiences caring for incarcerated inpatients in non-carceral settings in North Carolina and highlight sources of misunderstanding and potential conflicts that arise in the care of these patients.

Memento Mori and Photographic Perspective of Roadside Trauma.

David Nance's photographs invite us to cross the liminal space between road and roadside and to consider the experience that trauma surgeons share with injured patients and the families of the injured and the dead. Just as trauma surgeons use the tools of science and surgery to make order out of the chaos of "the scene," so patients' families use art, found objects, and grief to transform anonymous roadsides into specific, personal remembrances. Bound together by the uncertainties of trauma, we can all stand at the side of the road bearing witness to both the inevitability and unpredictability of death.

Glass Microparticulate Ingestion: An Unusual and Difficult-to-Diagnose Cause of Chronic Abdominal Pain.

In the absence of overt structural abnormalities, the diagnostic approach to chronic abdominal pain can be challenging. Occupational particulate inhalation causing injury to an organ other than the lung is rare. We report a case of inadvertent glass microparticulate ingestion causing chronic abdominal pain with altered local and systemic inflammatory responses.

Teaching technical skills to medical students during a surgery clerkship: results of a small group curriculum.

BACKGROUND: Opportunities for medical students to learn and perform technical skills during their clinical years have decreased. Alternative means to provide instruction are increasingly important. METHODS: Third-year students were assigned to three weekly small group tutorial sessions during their surgery clerkship. One hour sessions covered the following: suturing/knot tying, tubes (Foley catheter/NG tube), and lines (i.v. placement/arterial puncture). Students used a self-reported checklist to report their experience performing these procedures in the hospital after being exposed to them in the skills sessions. These data were compared with results prior to the implementation of the skills curriculum. Results were compared by Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Seventy-seven students had evaluable checklists during the control period, and 69 were evaluable during the study period. Participations in four specific skills were compared: Foley catheter placement, nasogastric tube insertion/removal, i.v. placement, and arterial stick. In all four skills, students were more likely to have performed the task after having been introduced to it in the skills sessions. For both Foley catheter placement (96% versus 90%; P = 0.05) and NG tube insertion/removal (70% versus 53%; P = 0.06) there was a trend toward a higher incidence of participation, although statistical significance was not met. However, for both IV placement (64% versus 18%; P = 0.0001) and arterial puncture (48% versus 18%; P = 0.0002) there were significant increases in participation between the study periods. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that a small group technical skills curriculum facilitates learning of specific technical skills and appears to increase participation in all of the skills taught and assessed. This may be one strategy to introduce students to technical skills during the surgery clerkship and improve participation of these skills in the hospital setting.

Free and local continuing medical education does not guarantee surgeon participation in maintenance of certification learning activities.

The American Board of Surgery has adopted the Maintenance of Certification requirement for surgeons. It requires continuous professional development (CPD) using active and passive learning modalities in contrast to traditional continuing medical education (CME). The Rural Trauma Team Development Course developed by the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma is a CPD learning activity. We provided 22 free courses between May 2007 and June 2009 to trauma care providers at 11 affiliated community and critical access hospitals. The course was taught on-site by an interdisciplinary group and at least one trauma surgeon was faculty. Free Category I CME credits and continuing education units were provided. Two hundred thirty-four providers attended and the majority were RNs (60%) and emergency medical technicians (21.8%). Only 18 were physicians (7.7%) and none were surgeons. The majority felt that they would change their practice as a result of the course but cited the lack of attendance at the course by emergency physicians and surgeons as a deficit. It may be that surgeons have barriers such as time away from a practice to attending these newer types of educational opportunities. Those who develop and offer these courses may need to develop different strategies to reach this target audience.